Home / Price Action / Ch 10: Combining Price Action with the Rest of the Toolkit
Ch 10 ยท Price Action
Combining Price Action with the Rest of the Toolkit
Price action isn't a religion. It combines cleanly with select indicators (volume, ATR, EMA regime), fits into option-selling strategies (short strangle strike selection), and can be codified into a mechanical system.
๐ 12 min
Price action isn't a religion. The traders who make money doing it don't reject other tools โ they use price action as the primary lens and layer on select tools that add signal without adding clutter. This chapter is the honest map of what plays well with price action and what doesn't.
10.1 Indicators worth combining with price action
Three, at most. Any more and you're not doing price action any more.
Volume โ always
Every price action setup improves when confirmed by volume. Reversal candle at support with volume expansion vs the same candle with dry volume โ completely different signals. Volume is not an indicator layered on top; it's essential context. Keep it on every chart.
ATR โ for stop sizing
Average True Range gives you a volatility-adjusted stop distance. A pin bar on Nifty in a low-VIX week has a 30-point stop; the same pin bar in a high-VIX week needs 60. ATR(14) mechanises this โ use it to size stops and positions consistently across regimes.
Pure price-action regime reading (HH/HL swings) is the gold standard but takes time to develop. As a scaffold, a single EMA 20 or 50 on the higher timeframe gives you a mechanical bias filter. When your PA reading disagrees with the EMA, that's a signal to slow down and re-check, not necessarily to override.
๐ก The 'one indicator per axis' rule from the TA path
The TA Ch 6 indicator combination rule applies here too: at most one trend indicator, one momentum indicator, one volatility indicator. If you're layering three moving averages on your price-action chart, you've drifted from price action into indicator-based trading.
10.2 Price action for option strike selection
Price-action reading isn't just for equity/futures trades. It's a powerful edge for option sellers picking strikes:
Weekly short strangle strike selection โ sell strikes beyond the current week's expected range as read from price action. Prior swing highs/lows on the daily are natural boundaries. See Options Ch 13
Iron condor short wings โ the short strikes should sit beyond meaningful S/R levels, not just at delta targets. Combining delta selection with structural S/R produces better win-rate outcomes than either alone
Debit spread strike selection โ the long strike sits at the current level; the short strike sits at the next opposing S/R. Price action tells you where the target level is, before you commit capital
Bull put spread โ sell puts at the strike just below the last well-tested support. If that support breaks, you're wrong and take the loss. Better than picking strikes by delta alone
These options strategies live in the Options learning path (Ch 10โ14 for spreads; Ch 13 short strangle; Ch 24 practical plays). PA reading is the layer that lets you pick which strikes to sell.
10.3 Codifying price action into a mechanical system
Some price-action setups can be codified into rule-based systems that don't require judgement to execute. Examples:
Pin bar at daily EMA 20 in an uptrend โ all criteria are measurable: pin bar shape (wick โฅ 2ร body), price near EMA 20, EMA 20 > EMA 50 sloping up. Enter on next-bar break; stop below pin low; target next resistance
Inside bar at prior day high โ measurable: today's range inside yesterday's, current price near prior day high. Enter on break; stop opposite extreme
NR7 at any daily-chart level โ measurable: today's range narrowest in 7 bars, price within 0.5% of a defined level. Enter on break in the level's expected direction
Note: not everything codifies. "Context" โ the judgment call about whether a level is meaningful โ is genuinely hard to automate. Setups that depend heavily on context (H&S completion, exhaustion bars, complex chart patterns) resist mechanisation and are the traders' bread-and-butter discretionary domain.
10.4 What to skip
Not everything in the indicator or pattern zoo helps a price-action trader. Explicit list of what to leave alone:
Ichimoku Cloud โ takes up half the chart, provides information you already have from candles + EMAs. Interesting for pure-mechanical traders; distracting for price-action readers
Elliott Wave โ too subjective, too many countable interpretations, retrofits to any chart. Rarely gives an unambiguous entry
Harmonic patterns (Gartley, Bat, Butterfly) โ very specific Fibonacci ratios required. Real setups are rare; forced setups are common. Not for beginners
Multiple oscillators stacked (RSI + Stochastic + Williams %R) โ all measure momentum, all lag price similarly. Pick one
Bollinger Bands layered on top of price action โ Bollinger Bands ARE price action (they draw the 2-standard-deviation envelope around a moving average). Redundant if you're reading the bars themselves. Useful only if you're specifically playing mean-reversion vs volatility expansion setups
10.5 The path from here
You have finished the price action path. What next depends on where you're trying to go:
Deepen the pattern vocabulary โ read the Technical Analysis path Chapters 4 and 5 for the pattern catalog viewed from a systematic angle
Add option strategies to your PA reading โ Options path Ch 4 onwards, particularly the spread strategies (10, 11, 14) and short strangles (13)
Price action reading + support/resistance + strategy design + trading records = the discretionary trader's core kit. Add the option-strategy layer on top when ready. The rest is repetition, journaling, and time.
AdvancedFinal honest note โ what price action can't do
Price action is a decision framework, not an oracle. Concrete limitations worth naming:
- **News-driven gaps** โ a stock that gaps 8% on earnings has no PA read. You either weren't in the trade or the trade is now managed entirely differently
- **Regime shifts** โ the transition from low-VIX to high-VIX (or vice versa) changes what patterns work. Setups that were reliable through a quiet quarter can fail systematically through an event-heavy quarter
- **Illiquid instruments** โ PA reading on names with light volume produces noise. Stick to top 100 F&O names
- **Multi-year positional trades** โ PA is a decision framework at each entry/exit point, not a way to predict where the market goes in 3 years. Use fundamentals for that horizon; use PA for the entry and stop management within it
Recognising these limits is the difference between a discretionary trader who lasts and one who blows up when the framework hits its blind spot.